Amended fee resolution and updated fence guidelines
In force signed/in-document date; no later repeal found
File: amendedfeefence.pdf · Recording: Doc 2013-13018952 · Document date: — · Effective: 2013-06-07 · Pages: 7
This text came from scanning and has errors. The original document governs; check it before relying on anything. Report a text error.
Open the original document (official PDF, elliottranchbuda.org)
Page 1
Liz Q. Gonzaiez
County Clerk
San Marcos, Texas 78666
70201313018952
InstrumentNumber:2013-13018952
As
Recorded On: June 07,2013
OPR RECORDINGS
Parties: ELLIOTT RANCH
Billabie Pages: 4
To
Number of Pages: 3
Comnent:
(PartiesfistedaboveareforClerksfeferenceonly)
+** Examined and Charged as Follows: **
OPRRECORDINGS
28.00
Totat Recording:
28.00
*********** DO NOT REMOVE. THIS PAGE IS PART OF THE INSTRUMENT
Any provision herein which restricts the Sale,Rental or use of the described REAL PROPERTY
because of color or race is invaid and unenforceable under federallaw.
File information:
Record and Return To:
DocumentNumber:2013-13018952
Receipt Nurnber: 338996
JEFFREYUSAKEWICZ
Recorded Date/rime: June 07,2013 02:44:51p
ORIGINALTO CUSTOMER
B00k-Vol/Pg:BK-OPR VL-4658 PG-831
SAN MARCOS TX 78666
User 1 Station: A Herzog - Cashiering #3
State ofTexas
County or Hays
I tnencty cenify thut this insirumem ws lilet foar rceurd in ny hicc tn tinc uatet unf
tidanpdhcnonandwasnuoetoneolmwudpugeofthtarcrds
ofHaysCountv,Texas
LizQGonzalez,Conny CLenk
Page 2
13018952
ANCH
AMmENDEDFEE RESDUTiON AND UPDATED
GUIDELINES
JUNE 7, 2013,FRIDAY
TNCLUSIONS
AMMENDEd IMPEONEMENT APUCATON FEE RtSOLUTiON
AMMENPED FENCE GUIDELINES
Page 3
658
228
ELLIOTT RANCH
Addendum to the Improvement Application Fee Resolution
Whereas Article 4, subsection (b) of the Amended and Restated Declarations of Covenants and
Restrictions (DCR's) for Elliott Ranch states that "no improvement shall be constructed on any tot within
Elliott Ranch without the approval of the Architectural Control Committee (AcC) as to the quality of
workmanship and materials, harmony of external design with the existing improvements, and as to the
location with respect to topography and finished grade elevations; "
Whereas in its efforts to carry out its duties to ensure that improvements meet the standards set forth
in Article 4, subsection(b), the Acc has instituted a post- completion inspection and compliance
procedure; and
Whereas the efficacy of that procedure will be enhanced by the implementation of an application fee
for improvements; and
Whereas Article 4, subsection(b) grants the Acc the power to “require the payment by each applicant of
a fee in the amount as established from time to time by the Committee to aid in its review, approval and
tracking of improvement;
The ACc hereby arnends the Improvement Application Fee Schedule effective June 2013. These fees are
intended to assist the ACC and the Elliott Ranch HOA Board of Directors to ensure that any fence
complies with Elliott Ranch DcR's, that it has been built according to AcC approved as built" pians, to
ensure all fences comply with the current Fence Guidelines; to ensure that the application fee is fair and
balanced; regarding the latter, the application fee is a progressive fee dependent on the totat linear feet
of fence;
The amended Improvement Application Fee is intended to supplement the Improvement Application
Fee (January2012) and does not supersede, restrict or replace or conflict with any provisions or fees
currently scheduled.
Addendum to the Fee Schedule:
For wood or metal fences that are 200 linear feet or less the fee is $250
For wood or metal fences that are between 201 and 500 linear feet the fee is $400
For wood or metal fences that exceed 501 linear feet or more the fee is $500.
All fees will be returned following a favorable compliance inspection to ensure that the fence was
constructed in accordance with AcC approved plans; and that the maintenance program
(staining/preservative) has been done.
June 2013
Page 4
Bk
Vol
4658
130189520FF
Amendment to Elliott Ranch Fence Guidelines
Whereas Article 4, subsection (b) of the Arnended and Restated Declarations of Covenants and
Restrictions (DCR's) for Elliott Ranch states that "no improvement shall be constructed on any
lot within Elliott Ranch without the approval ofthe Architectural Control Committee (AcC)as to
quality of workmanship and materials, Harmony of external design with existing improvements, and as
to the location with respect to topography and finished grade elevations";
Whereas fences can have a significant impact on the appearance of our community, have the propensity
to affect the value of not only the lot on which they are erected but also affect the value of adjacent
lots, and have been a source of difficulties in our community;
Whereas the effect referenced in the above paragraph is highly influenced by the size and location of
thefence;
Whereas the DcR's are not uniforn with regard to fence location; specifically, the DCR's allow fences
to extend beyond the rear corner of the house for lots in phases 1--3 lots, while fences lacated on
phase 4 lots cannot extend beyond the rear corner of the house;
Whereas the AcC wishes to provide further guidance for the construction of fences in Elliott Ranch in
order to promote uniformity and harmony within the community while providing fairness in the
process;
Whereas this amended guidance does not supersede, replace or restrict or conflict with any covenant or
conditions in the DCR's or the current Fence Guidelines.
The Acc hereby wishes to amend the current Fence Guidelines that were published in January 2012.
These amended guide lines are intended to supplement current Fence Guidelines, promote external
design harmony and consistency among the four Phases of development in the community, provide
clarity around the application process, and facilitate the Acc's review process while ensuring
campliance with approved plans; therefore per Article 4 section (e) of the Amended and Restated
Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions (DCR's) or Elliott Ranch which in part, empowers the ACC to
adopt development guidelines as it may deem necessary or proper for the orderly development of
Elliott Ranch, the AcC amends the Fence Guidelines of January 2012 as follows:
1. For lots located in phases 1 -3: All fences constructed of cedar or pressure treated wood (solid
wood fences) that extend beyond the rear corner of the house outward toward the road but not
beyond the front corner of the house and do not have a front fence cannecting to the house,
must be double picketed fromn the rear corner of the house forward so that supporting
structures or framing materialis are concealed and not visible from the road on both sides.
June2013
Page 5
Bk
13018952 0PR
4658
THE STATE OF TETAS
SAXt ALNNOD
BEENE ME ON
THIS INSTEDMENT NAS ACKNDWLETGED
June 7
Z013
TE ELLOTT
BEHALF OF TIE AZCHITECTUEAL-
UOMMITTEE
RANCH HOMEOWNERIS ASSOCIATION.
e Clliott' Rave(
NOTART PUBLC
STATE OFTEKAS
PRISCILLA MENDOZA
Notary Pubic, State of Texas
My Comission Expires
SEPTEMBER 5,2014
NOTAEY SEAL
Page 6
(b) Approval of Plans and Specifications:
Addendum to the Improvement Application Fee Resolution.
Whereas Article 4, subsection (b) of the Amended and Restated Declarations of Covenants and
Restrictions (DCR's) for Elliott Ranch states that "no improvement shall be constructed on any lot within
Elliott Ranch without the approval of the Architectural Control Committee (ACC) as to the quality of
workmanship and materials, harmony of external design with the existing improvements, and as to the
location with respect to topography and finished grade elevations;
Whereas in its efforts to carry out its duties to ensure that improvements meet the standards
set forth in Article 4, subsection(b), the Acc has instituted a post- completion inspection and compliance
procedure; and
Whereas the efficacy of that procedure will be enhanced by the implementation of an
application fee for improvements; and
Whereas Article 4, subsection(b) grants the Acc the power to "require the payment by each
applicant of a fee in the amount as established from time to time by the Committee to aid in its review,
approval and tracking of improvement;
The Acc hereby amends the Improvement Application Fee Schedule effective June 2013. These
fees are intended to assist the AcC and the Elliott Ranch HOA Board of Directors to ensure that any
fence complies with Elliott Ranch DCR's, that it has been built according to AcC approved, as built, plans,
tonsure all fences comply with the current Fence Guidelines; to ensure that the application fee is fair
andbalanced; regarding the latter, the application fee is a progressive fee dependent on the total linear
feetof fence;
Application Fee (January 2012) and does not supersede, restrict or repiace or conflict with any
provisions or fees currenty scheduled.
Addendum to the Fee Schedule:
For wood or metal fences that are 200 linear feet or less the fee is $250
For w0od or metal fences that are between 200 linear and 500 linear feet the fee is $400.
For wood or metal fences that exceed 500 linear feet or more the fee is $500.
All fees will be returned foilowing a favorable compliance inspection to ensure that the fence was
constructed in accordance with Acc approved plans; and that the maintenance program
(staining/preservative) has been done.
June 2013
Page 7
Amendment to Elliott Ranch Fence Guidelines
Whereas Article 4, subsection (b) of the Amended and Restated Declarations of Covenants and
Restrictions (DCR's) for Elliott Ranch states that "no improvement shall be constructed on any lot within
Elliott Ranch without the approval of the Architectural Control Committee (AcC) as to quality of
workmanship and materials, Harmony of externai design with existing improvements, and as to the
location with respect to topography and finished grade elevations";
Whereas fences can have a significant impact on the appearance of our community, have the
propensity to affect the value of not only the lot on which they are erected but also affect the value of
adjacent lots, and have been a source of difficulties in our community;
Whereas the effect referenced in the above paragraph is highly influenced by the size and
location of the fence;
Whereas the DCR's are not uniform with regard to fence location; specifically, the DCR's
ailow corner of the house for lots in Phases 1- 3 lots, while fences located on
phase 4 iots cannot extend beyond the rear corner of the house;
Whereas the AcC wishes to provide further guidance for the construction of fences in Elliott
Ranch in
order to promote uniformity and harmony within the community while providing fairness in the process;
Whereas this amended guidance does not supersede, replace or restrict or conflict with any
covenant or conditions in the DCR's or the current fences to extend beyond the rear
Fence Guidelines.
The AcC hereby wishes to amend the current Fence Guidelines that were published in January
2012. These amended guide lines are intended to supplement current Fence Guidelines, promote
externa! design harmony and consistency among the four Phases of development in the community,
provide clarity around the application process, and facilitate the Acc's review process while ensuring
compiance with approved plans; therefore per Article 4 section (e) of the Amended and Restated
Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions (DCR's) or Elliott Ranch which in part, empowers the ACC to
adopt development guidelines as it may deem necessary or proper for the orderly development of Elliott
Ranch, the AcC amends the Fence Guidelines of January 2012 as follows:
1.For lots located in Phases 1- -3: All fences constructed of cedar or pressure treated wood (solid wood
fences) that extend beyond the rear corner of the house outward toward the road but not beyond the
front corner of the house and do not have a front fence connecting to the house, must be double
are concealed and not visible from the road on both sides.
June 2013
See something wrong or out of date? Report a problem with this page.