Skip to main content

Adoption of a procedure and guidelines for the exercise of Architectural Review Authority

In force recorded instrument; no later repeal found in 217 docs

File: 2021-11-09ArchitecturalReviewProceduresGuidelines[Recorded]-Elliott Ranch.pdf · Recording: 22004465 · Document date: 2021-11-09 · Effective: 2022-01-31 · Pages: 9

This text came from scanning and has errors. The original document governs; check it before relying on anything. Report a text error.

Open the original document (official PDF, elliottranchbuda.org)

Page 1

22004465 RESOLUTION Total Pages: 9 Filedand Recorded:01/31/202209:56:53AM CERTIFIED RESOLUTIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ELLIOTT RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES FOR THE EXERCISE OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 209 OF THE TEXAS PROPERTY CODE The undersigned, Donra Ceurtrig ht , as the duly elected, qualified, and acting Secretary of Elliott Ranch Homeowners Association, Inc., a Texas nonprofit corporation (the “"Association"), hereby certifies on behalf of the Association that the following resolutions were duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Association (the “Board") at a meeting of the Board held on Decem her /5 , 2021, and that such preamble and resolutions have not been amended or rescinded and are in full force and effect on the date hereof. WHEREAS, the Association is a property owners association governed by Chapter 209 of the Texas Property Code and is vested with the authority to enforce restrictive covenants and other terms and provisions of that certain Amended and Restated Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for Elliott Ranch recorded at Volume 1512, Page 913 in the Official Public Records of Hays County, Texas, as may be amended from time to time (collectively, the “Declaration'") WHEREAS, Chapter 209 of the Texas Property Code imposes certain procedures for the denial of a property owner's application for architectural review of proposed construction or modification of an improvement and establishes procedures for appealing a denial of an application for architectural review to the Association's Board of Directors WHEREAS, the Board desires to adopt procedures and guidelines for conducting architectural review of a property owner's application for proposed construction or modification of an improvement in compliance with Chapter 209 of the Texas Property Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board hereby adopts the procedures and guidelines set forth on Exhibit "A', attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. BE IT RESOLVED, FURTHER, that, the Secretary of the Association is hereby authorized and empowered, in the name and on behalf of the Association, from time to time to do and perform all such further acts and things and to execute and deliver all such further instruments as he or she may deem necessary or advisable to carry out and effectuate the intent and purposes of the foregoing resolutions and of the actions referred to therein. BE IT RESOLVED, FURTHER, that any actions taken by the officers or directors of the Association prior to the date of this action or hereafter that are within the authority conferred hereby are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved as the act and deed of the Association. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] ELLIOTTRANCH HOMEOWNERSASSOCLA TION, NC. RESOLUTIONADOPTINGPROCEDURESANDGUIDELINESFOR THE EXERCISE OFARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AUTHORITY PURSUANT TOCHAPTER 209OF THETEXAS PROPERTY CODE

Page 2

22004465 Page 2 of 9 SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as Secretary on behaif of the Association to be effective upon the recording of this document in the Official Public Records of Hays County, Texas. By: ma Title: Secretary STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF HAYS $ 'Cat Chf, Secretary of Elliott Ranch Homeowners Association, Inc., a Fexas non-profit corporation, On behalf of said non-profit corporation. CHRISTINA JELLISON Notary ID #126370443 My Commission Expires Ndtary Public Signature November 2, 2023 AFTER RECORDING PLEASE RETURN TO: Gregory S. Cagle CAGLE PUGH, LTD. LLP 4301 Westbank Drive, Ste. A-150 Austin, Texas 78746 ELLIOTT RANCH HOMEOWNERSASSOCIA TION,INC. RESOLUTIONADOPTINGPROCEDURESANDGUIDELINESFORTHEEXERCISEOFARCHITECTURALREVIEW AUTHORITYPURSUANTTOCHAPTER2O9OFTHETEXASPROPERTYCODE

Page 3

Page 3 of 9 22004465 EXHIBIT A ELLIOTT RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES FOR THE EXERCISE OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 209 OF THE TEXAS PROPERTY CODE ARTICLE I Introduction The architectural review of applications for construction or modification of improvements is a vital task for ensuring that improvements constructed in Elliott Ranch Homeowners Association, Inc. community (the "Community") are in compliance with the terms and provisions of the governing documents applicable to the community. Such task commonly invoives a high degree of discretionary determinations, which may be scrutinized or disagreed with by others after the fact. In order to provide greater transparency and procedures for redress when property owners disagree with architectural review decisions concerning their property, the Texas legislature enacted Section 209.00505 of the Texas Property Code, which imposes new procedures for the denial of a property owner's application for architectural review and establishes procedures for appealing a denial of an application for architectural review to the property owners association's board of directors. These procedures and guidelines are intended to assist the Architectural Control Committee, (the "Architectural Committee") in the review and approval or denial of an application for architectural review of proposed construction or modification of an improvement and, if applicable, the appellate review of a denied application (the “Guidelines"). The Guidelines have been prepared by the Cagle Pugh law firm specifically for the Architectural Commitee and the Board of Directors (the "Board') of Elliott Ranch Homeowners Association, Inc., (the "Association') and are based on that certain Amended and Restated Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for Elliott Ranch recorded at Volume 1512. Page 913 in the Official Public Records of Hays County, Texas, as amended from time to time (collectively, the "Declaration"). ARTICLE I Purpose The purpose of the Architectural Committee is to serve as a "gate-keeping" function for the construction of improvements in a development. In most Declarations, property owners are required to submit an application for the construction of new improvements or the modification of existing improvements to the Architectural Committee for its review in advance of initiating construction, and the Architectural Committee is vested with exclusive discretion to determine whether such proposed construction of new improvements or modification of existing improvements is in compliance with the Restrictive Covenants applicable to the community. Often such task also involves a subjective determination as to whether the proposed construction is aesthetically attractive and harmonious with the other structures in the community. The authority to review and approve construction of new improvements and/or modifications to existing improvements is generally referred to as the “Architectural Review Authority." ARTICLE III Improvements Requiring Approval of the Architectural Committee The necessity of obtaining approvai from an architectural committee is derived from a land-use restriction contained in the dedicatory instruments applicable to the community. Such land-use restriction ELLIOTT RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIA TION, INC. PROCEDURESANDGUIDELINES FOR THE EXERCISE OFARCHITECTURALREVIEWAUTHORITY PURSUANTTOCHAPTER209OFTHETEXASPROPERTYCODE

Page 4

Page 4 of 9 22004465 EXHIBIT A will often restrict property owners from constructing or modifying certain improvements, buildings and/or structures without the advance written approval of the architectural committee. The scope of items requiring approval of the architectural committee is specified by the dedicatory instruments applicable to the community. The Declaration for the Community requires the following items to be submitted to and approved by the Architectural Committee: 1. No Improvement, and no antenna nor any mechanism or devise that provides for the collection, storage or distribution of solar or wind energy for use as thermal, mechanical or electrical energy and that is not part of a building, shall be erected. placed. altered or maintained on any Lot until a copy of the Plans and Specifications and a plan showing the location of such Improvements have been delivered to and approved by the Committee. "Improvement" shall mean every structure and all appurtenances thereto of every type and kind. including but not limited to buildings, barns, outbuildings, storage sheds, patios, tennis courts, swimming pools, garages, storage buildings, fences, screening walls, retaining walls, stairs, decks, landscaping. poles. signs. exterior air conditioning, water softener fixtures or equipment, poles, pumps, wells, tanks, reservoirs, pipes, lines, meters, antennas, towers, windmills, and any faculties used in connection with water, sanitary sewer, wastewater, septic tank, storm sewer, drainage, gas, electric, telephone, regular or cable television, or other utilities. ARTICLE IV Scope of Architectural Review Authority The authority of the Architectural Committee to approve or deny a property owner's application to construct or modify an improvement is not without limitation. In a 1981 case law opinion, entitled Davis v. Huey, the Texas Supreme Court held that dedicatory instrument provisions requiring the submission of plans to and prior consent of an architectural committee before construction of improvements are valid "insofar as they furnish adequate notice to the homeowners of the specific restriction sought to be enforced" and that an architectural committee may not impose building restrictions upon property owners that are more stringent than those specifically set out in the dedicatory instruments through its discretionary authority to disapprove proposed construction projects. In other words, even if a dedicatory instrument vests an architectural committee with discretionary approval authority, the architectural committee is not permitted to alter or expand the specific building restrictions or to impose limitations on a property owner's construction or remodeling project that are more restrictive than the specific restrictions set out elsewhere in the dedicatory instrument. Thus, the scope of an architectural committee's review of an application for proposed construction or modification of an improvement is generally dictated by the express provisions of the dedicatory instrument establishing such committee, and an architectural committee may not exercise architectural review authority over characteristics of a proposed improvement that is not expressly within such scope of review. The permitted scope of Architectural Review Authority by the Architectural Committee established by the Declaration is as follows: 1. The Committee shall approve the proposed plans as to the quality of workmanship and materials, harmony of external design with the existing Improvements and as to the location with respect to topography and finished grade elevations. ELLIOTTRANCH HOMEOWNERSASSOCLATION, INC. PURSUANTTOCHAPTER2O9OFTHETEXASPROPERTYCODE

Page 5

Page 5 of 9 22004465 EXHIBIT A ARTICLE V Variance Authority It is very common for a dedicatory instrument to vest an architectural committee with the power to grant a property owner a variance from compliance with one or more of the land-use restrictions in the dedicatory instrument regarding construction or modification of an improvement. When such variance authority is granted to an architectural committee it may be limited to certain types of land-use restrictions or the architectural committee may be restricted from granting a variance except in limited circumstances where the architectural committee determines there is good cause or justification for allowing the deviation and such variance will not have an adverse impact on the community. The Declaration does grant the Architectural Committee the authority to grant variances when, in the opinion of the Committee. a waiver or modification of any of the restrictive covenants of the Declaration would not impair or detract from the high quality of the Property. In addition, the Architectural Committee may grant conditional variances (i.e., variances that are conditioned upon the continued existence of certain conditions) or temporary variances (i.e., variances that expire upon the expiration of specified period of time or upon an event, such as the sale of the lot). The variance must be in writing and be in recordable form. ARTICLE VI Time Period for Review The Declaration provides that an application for architectural review must be completed and communicated to the requesting property owner (or his or her representative) within thirty (30) days from submission. It is very important that the Architectural Committee comply with this deadline as the failure to do so will result in an approval of the application by default. If the Architectural Committee does not have sufficient information from the requesting property owner to be able to approve an application within the specified time period to do so, the Architectural Committee should deny the application for such reason before the explanation of the deadline, request the additional information needed to perform a review of the application, and inform the requesting property owner that the application will be reconsidered by the Architectural Committee upon receipt of the requested information. ARTICLE VII Denial of an Application Section 209.00505 of the Texas Property Code requires ali denials of an application for construction or modification of an improvement to be in writing and delivered to the requesting property owner by certified mail, hand-delivery, or electronic delivery. The written denial must also (1) describe the basis for the denial in reasonable detail and changes, if any, to the application or improvements required as a condition to approval; and (2) inform the property owner that he or she may request a hearing with the board of directors for the purpose of appealing the denial by the architectural committee on or before the thirtieth (3oth) day after the date the written denial is mailed, hand-delivered or electronically delivered to the property owner. Based on the permitted scope of Architectural Review Authority described above, an application may be denied by the Architectural Committee for one (1) or more of the following reasons: ELLIOTTRANCHHOMEOWNERSASSOCLATION,INC. PROCEDURESANDGUIDELINES FORTHE EXERCISE OFARCHITECTURALREVIEWAUTHORITY PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 209 OF THE TEXAS PROPERTY CODE

Page 6

Page 6 of 9 22004465 EXHIBIT A 1. The Committee disapproved the proposed plans due to the lack of quality of workmanship and materials. 2. The Committee disapproved the proposed plans due to the lack of harmony of external design with the existing Improvements. 3. The Committee disapproved the proposed plans due to the location with respect to topography and finished grade elevations. A template letter for denial of an application that conforms to the Architectural Committee's scope of Architectural Review Authority under the Declaration and complies with the requirements of Section 209.00505 of the Texas Property Code is attached hereto as Exhibit A-1 and the Architectural Committee is strongly encouraged to use such template when denying a property owner's application for architectural review. The denial of an application letter should state all applicable reasons for the denial. ARTICLE VIII Appellate Review by the Board If a request for an appellate review hearing is timely received from a property owner, the Board must conduct an appellate review hearing not later than the thirtieth (3oth) day after the date the Board receives the property owner's request and the Board must provide the property owner notice of the date, time, and place of the hearing not later than the tenth (1oth) day before the date of the hearing. During an appellate review hearing, the Board, or a designated representative of the Association, and the owner, or his or her designated representative, will each be provided the opportunity to discuss, verify facts, and resolve the denial of the property owner's application or request for the construction or modification of an improvement, and the changes, if any, requested by the architectural committee in the written denial provided to the property owner. The Board or the property owner may request a postponement of the scheduled hearing. If requested, a postponement shall be granted for a period of not more than ten (10) days. Subsequent postponements may be granted by agreement of the parties. The Association and/or the property owner may make an audio recording of the appellate review hearing. The Board is authorized to affirm, modify, or reverse, in whole or in part, any decision of the Architectural Committee concerning an application for construction of an improvement, as consistent with the Declaration. In other words, the Board is limited to the same scope of architectural review as the Architectural Committee. ELLIOTT RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIA TION, INC. PROCEDURESANDGUIDELINESFOR THEEXERCISEOFARCHITECTURALREVIEWAUTHORITY PURSUANT TOCHAPTER 209 OF THE TEXAS PROPERTY CODE

Page 7

Page 7 of 9 22004465 EXHIBIT A-1 ELLIOTT RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. Architectural Control Committee 2021 [Insert Owner Name] Via Certified Mail, Hand-Delivery, and/or Electronic Delivery RE: Denial of application for construction or modification of improvement at (the "Property") submitted to the Architectural Control Committee (the “Committee") on , 2021 (the “"Application") Dear [insert owner name]: Thank you for your submission of the Application. The Committee has denied the Application for the following reasons: The Committee disapproved the proposed plans due to the lack of quality of workmanship and materials. The Committee disapproved the proposed plans due to the iack of harmony of external design with the existing Improvements. The Committee disapproved the proposed plans due to the location with respect to topography and finished grade elevations. instrument and/or requested by the Committee. Please provided the required/requested information and the Committee will reconsider the Application Other: [if applicable - add the following provision] Notwithstanding the denial above, the Committee shall reconsider its denial and approve the Application on the following conditions: Pursuant to Section 209.00505 of the Texas Property Code, you may request an appellate review hearing with the Board of Directors of Elliott Ranch Homeowners Association, Inc., (the “Board"). A ELLIOTTRANCH HOMEOWNERSASSOCIATION,INC. PROCEDURESAND GUIDELINES FOR THE EXERCISE OFARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AUTHORITY PURSUANTTOCHAPTER2O9OFTHETEXASPROPERTYCODE

Page 8

22004465 Page 8 of 9 EXHIBIT A-1 request for an appellate review hearing must be delivered to the Board on or before the thirtieth (3oth) day from the date this notice was transmitted to you at the following mailing and/or email address: Sincerely, [insert name] [insert title] ELLIOTTRANCHHOMEOWNERSASSOCLATION,INC. PROCEDURESANDGUIDELINESFORTHEEXERCISEOFARCHITECTURALREVIEWAUTHORITY PURSUANTTOCHAPTER209OFTHETEXASPROPERTYCODE

Page 9

22004465 Page 9 of 9 THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF HAYS I hereby certify that this instrument was FILED on the date and the time stamped hereon by me and was duly RECORDED in the Records of Hays County, Texas. 22004465 RESOLUTION 01/31/2022 09:56:53 AM Total Fees: $54.00 Elaine H. Cardenas, MBA, PhD,County Clerk Hays County, Texas EauindlCarsionas-

See something wrong or out of date? Report a problem with this page.

Home Back to top